Source Code
Director:
Duncan Jones
Writer
Ben Ripley
Starring
Jake Gyllenhaal, Michelle Monaghan, Vera Farmiga
Plot:
This film is about a man is in a room and is put in the same situation numerous times to try and save a bomb from going off. The soldier wakes in the body of this man on the train and has to try and stop the bomb from going off and trying to find who planted the bomb as there is rumours that another bomb is going to go off in another part of America. His mission is to save the people on the train and to stop further explosions from going on.
The storyline also has humorous effects to it. This is a rate kind of thriller as it keeps you on the edge of your seat with all of the action scenes but can easily give you a laugh. One example of a humorous moment in the film is when Jake goes back into the scene and already knows what is going to happen as it has happened times before. For example, coffee gets spilled over him in every scene and he manages to stop this and this amazes Michelle. We can also see the chemistry between Jake and Michelle as the audience get a good laugh from them. There is a good use of romance, suspense, mystery and thrills in this film which makes it a well made film.
Cinematography is used well in this film as he shots are used consistently throughout the same scenes and there are a lot of close up scenes which show the emotions of the characters.
The ending is a good ending to the film as it answers a few questions but also leaves more questions to be answered. This is a good way to end a film because it makes the audience really think about the film even after it is finished so it would make the audience more interested in the film.
I think that this trailer is pretty effective as the storyline is made clear and the trailer isn't boring. The trailer isn't boring because there are a lot of action scenes within the trailer, Also,we get to know a lot about what is going to happen within the film. It has been edited well because the action scenes are edited really quickly and action scenes are supposed to be edited quickly to keep the audience interested in what is going on. The target audience is probably young male teenagers and young male adults because there are a lot of action scenes and explosions which would appeal to this target audience as this is what they would enjoy.
This is the opening 5 minutes of the film. The film starts with a man called Sean waking up on a train while Christina is talking to him. Sean gets confused when Christina calls him Sean because he doesn't go by that name. He says that his name is Captain Stevens but Christina laughs it off. Sean is seen to be looking around the train observing the surroundings which includes coffee being spilt on his shoe and being asked for his ticket. He doesn't really pay much attention to what she is saying. He says he feels sick and walks around the train looking around and asking random questions. He then goes into the bathroom and sees a different man in the mirror and gets confused. He goes back to sit with Christina and she gets worried about him. The train then explodes to end the scene killing everyone.
This is a video which describes how the train scenes were made. The director is talking about how he wanted to use techniques from Hitchcock films. This is made clear on the train scenes as the scenes from Source Code and Strangers On A Train are looked to be very similar. Also, Jake Gyllenhaal is wearing a suit much like the men in Strangers On A Train. They decided to film the train scenes on a set rather than an actual train because the event is revisited so that everything can stay the same which would include the backgrounds and so that the audience wouldn't get bored.
This is a scene from the film in which Sean calls a man called Donald Stevens and talks to him about how his son unfortunately died during war. Sean says how he knew his son well from the war and from working together. We then hear how Donald gets emotional and tells Sean that he loves his son. This scene is very emotional because of the background music is very soft and made to make the audience feel sorry for Sean and Donald. Also, the close up shots of Seans face show that he is emotional and that he is close to tears.
This is the last scene of the film and it opens up the possibility of a sequel. This is because that Sean finds out more about the Source Code which nobody else knew about and this knowledge could be used in a possible sequel film.
Monday, 23 December 2013
Monday, 16 December 2013
Collateral
Collateral - 2004 A crime thriller
Directed by:
Michael Mann
Written by:
Stuart Beattie
Starring:
Tom Cruise, Jamie Foxx, Jade Pinkett Smith
This film was co produced by DreamWorks and Paramount Studios. DreamWorks handled the rights to this film in North America whereas Paramount handled the rights to this film internationally everywhere else. In 2006, when Paramount purchased DreamWorks and therefore aquired the North American rights to this film. Paramount released Collateral on blu ray on March 30th 2010.
The film opened August 6th 2004 in 3188 theatres across USA and Canada and grossed $24.7 million in the opening weekend and was number 1 at the box office. It eventually grossed $101,005,703 across USA and Canada and grossed a total of $116,758,588 across other countries for a total international gross of $217,764,291.
Plot:
Max Durocher (Jamie Foxx) is a cab driver who dreams of having his own limo company one day. He's been a cab driver for the last 12 years and that's how he makes his living. He picks up a woman called Annie (Jade Pinkett Smith). He drives her downtown to her destination and then moves on. His next customer is a man called Vincent (Tom Cruise). Vincent offers Max $700 to make only 5 stops and then driving him to the airport. Max thinks this is a very good deal and can't refuse. Max takes Vincent to the first stop and waits in the car while Vincent goes into the building. Max sits in the car and sees a dead body fall out of the window. Max learns that Vincent is a calculating assassin and that these 5 stops will consist of Vincent killing people. Max hates the idea of driving Vincent round but is almost bullied into driving him round. Max tries to say no to Vincent but he is forced into driving him round because of the threat that Vincent makes when he says that he would kill him. The police learn of Vincent and Max's involvement in the killings and this creates a typical cat and mouse game which then delivers a surprise ending.
This film was Michael Manns' first feature film to be mostly shot using high definition cameras. Michael Mann decided to use the Viper Film Stream High - Definition Camera to film most of the scenes in this film. It was the first time this camera had been used in a major motion picture. However, there are some scenes where there is evidence that a digital camera is used. For example, in the scenes where the landscape is visible in the background.
A good use of camera technique is the scene where the coyotes are seen to be running across the road. The low light capability allowed Mann to be able film this scene without having to set up lighting.
This scene was shot using 35mm film.
Collateral was sat on DreamWorks development for 3 years. Mimi Leder was supposed to be the director but then he pulled out. Janusz Kaminski was then supposed to direct it but then he pulled out so it then went to Michael Mann. It was initially Russell Crowes' idea to get Michael Mann as the director but there was constant delays with the film so Russell Crow eventually left. Michael Mann then approached Tom Cruise with the idea of playing Vincent and also wanted Adam Sandler to be Max. Robert De Niro was also a contender to play Max but the studio refused as they wanted a younger actor.
Collateral started getting public attention when Russell Crowe said that he was interested in playing the role of Vincent. He didn't get this role and instead it went to Tom Cruise.
This scene is where the police make Max stop the taxi because he has a smashed windshield and blood on the windshield. The police question Max about why his windshield is smashed and why it has blood on it and why there is a food mess in the car. Cinematography is used well in this scene because there are plenty of close ups which show Max's face as he stutters a lot and has to think of excuses to why his windscreen is smashed. There is a body in the trunk of the car as the police want the trunk to be opened and Max has to do everything he can to stop the trunk from being opened.
This is a scene where Max and Vincent visit the hospital to visit Max's mum, Ida. Vincent buys his mum flowers because she is in hospital. Ida and Vincent have a conversation about Max while he is in the room with them. Vincent refers to himself as a friend of Max's rather than a client. The irony of this scene is when Ida says "You'd have to put a gun to his head to get him to do anything". This dialogue is ironic because when she says this, Vincent and Max exchange looks because Vincent actually does put a gun to Max's head earlier in the film and obviously Ida doesn't know about this.
Directed by:
Michael Mann
Written by:
Stuart Beattie
Starring:
Tom Cruise, Jamie Foxx, Jade Pinkett Smith
This film was co produced by DreamWorks and Paramount Studios. DreamWorks handled the rights to this film in North America whereas Paramount handled the rights to this film internationally everywhere else. In 2006, when Paramount purchased DreamWorks and therefore aquired the North American rights to this film. Paramount released Collateral on blu ray on March 30th 2010.
The film opened August 6th 2004 in 3188 theatres across USA and Canada and grossed $24.7 million in the opening weekend and was number 1 at the box office. It eventually grossed $101,005,703 across USA and Canada and grossed a total of $116,758,588 across other countries for a total international gross of $217,764,291.
Plot:
Max Durocher (Jamie Foxx) is a cab driver who dreams of having his own limo company one day. He's been a cab driver for the last 12 years and that's how he makes his living. He picks up a woman called Annie (Jade Pinkett Smith). He drives her downtown to her destination and then moves on. His next customer is a man called Vincent (Tom Cruise). Vincent offers Max $700 to make only 5 stops and then driving him to the airport. Max thinks this is a very good deal and can't refuse. Max takes Vincent to the first stop and waits in the car while Vincent goes into the building. Max sits in the car and sees a dead body fall out of the window. Max learns that Vincent is a calculating assassin and that these 5 stops will consist of Vincent killing people. Max hates the idea of driving Vincent round but is almost bullied into driving him round. Max tries to say no to Vincent but he is forced into driving him round because of the threat that Vincent makes when he says that he would kill him. The police learn of Vincent and Max's involvement in the killings and this creates a typical cat and mouse game which then delivers a surprise ending.
This film was Michael Manns' first feature film to be mostly shot using high definition cameras. Michael Mann decided to use the Viper Film Stream High - Definition Camera to film most of the scenes in this film. It was the first time this camera had been used in a major motion picture. However, there are some scenes where there is evidence that a digital camera is used. For example, in the scenes where the landscape is visible in the background.
A good use of camera technique is the scene where the coyotes are seen to be running across the road. The low light capability allowed Mann to be able film this scene without having to set up lighting.
This scene was shot using 35mm film.
Collateral was sat on DreamWorks development for 3 years. Mimi Leder was supposed to be the director but then he pulled out. Janusz Kaminski was then supposed to direct it but then he pulled out so it then went to Michael Mann. It was initially Russell Crowes' idea to get Michael Mann as the director but there was constant delays with the film so Russell Crow eventually left. Michael Mann then approached Tom Cruise with the idea of playing Vincent and also wanted Adam Sandler to be Max. Robert De Niro was also a contender to play Max but the studio refused as they wanted a younger actor.
Collateral started getting public attention when Russell Crowe said that he was interested in playing the role of Vincent. He didn't get this role and instead it went to Tom Cruise.
This scene is where the police make Max stop the taxi because he has a smashed windshield and blood on the windshield. The police question Max about why his windshield is smashed and why it has blood on it and why there is a food mess in the car. Cinematography is used well in this scene because there are plenty of close ups which show Max's face as he stutters a lot and has to think of excuses to why his windscreen is smashed. There is a body in the trunk of the car as the police want the trunk to be opened and Max has to do everything he can to stop the trunk from being opened.
This is a scene where Max and Vincent visit the hospital to visit Max's mum, Ida. Vincent buys his mum flowers because she is in hospital. Ida and Vincent have a conversation about Max while he is in the room with them. Vincent refers to himself as a friend of Max's rather than a client. The irony of this scene is when Ida says "You'd have to put a gun to his head to get him to do anything". This dialogue is ironic because when she says this, Vincent and Max exchange looks because Vincent actually does put a gun to Max's head earlier in the film and obviously Ida doesn't know about this.
Wednesday, 11 December 2013
Past Student Thriller Analysis
Before I start filming my own opening to a thriller, I am going to be analysing past thrillers which have been done by students of Robert Clack. By doing this, I should be able to get ideas on how to make my film look as good as possible, and how to avoid making mistakes. I am going to be analysing 3 different films and am going to be answering the following questions about them:
Does it look like the opening of a film?
Can you see any "thriller" conventions?
Have they made good use of mise-en-scene?
Is there a combination of diegetic and non-diegetic sound?
Have they made any technical mistakes (e.g. poor lighting, shaky camera)?
Is the quality of the performance at a high level?
After answering these questions, I shall be grading the film based on these numbers:
4- Excellent
3- Proficient
2- Minimal
1- Basic
Treachery
I think that this could be seen as the opening to a thriller but it could be also seen as a possible trailer.
One of the conventions of a thriller is a cliffhanger and that is seen in this thriller as the film ends with a cliffhanger of what's going to happen and who is actually going to die as two people are seen to be tied up. I think they have made good use of the mise-en-scene as there is alot of darkness in this thriller and darkness is a key point of a thriller because of the negative mood that it suggests. I think that they have made good use of the diegetic and non diegetic sound. For example, the diegetic sound is used well and you can hear it the boys voice that he doesn't want to kill anymore. An example of non-diegetic sound which is used well is the background music as it creates the mood of danger and that something bad is going to happen. When I watched this, I was able to spot a few technical mistakes that they made. One mistake that they made is at 0:33, when the girl is giving the picture to the boy. When she speaks, it is hard to hear what she is actually saying as the audio levels are really low. Another technical mistake that is made in this film is at 0:43 when there is a shot of the boy looking at the picture and thinking. We see a slight camera movement to the left which is a technical mistake. All things considered, I think this film is a good film but it could be improved.
Rating: High 2/Low 3
Finders Keepers
I think that this opening to a thriller has been mad very well as it contains many elements of a thriller. For example, it has the MacGuffin in where the first man in the suit goes into his pocket to pull out what the audience might think is a gun but he actually pulls out a mobile phone. A cliffhanger is also used well at the end of the thriller as the audience will want to know what is going to happen next with the 3 men who end the scene. I also think they have made good use of the misc-en-scene as the men in the suits look very convincing and very business like. They also used the chase scene very well. There is good use of non diegetic sound with the music in the background which creates the suspense within the film. However, I feel that there should be more diegetic sounds in terms of speech etc. I wasn't able to find any technical mistakes. All things considered, I think that this is a very good opening.
Rating 4
Hidden
I think that this is a decent opening to a thriller. They have used a lot of darkness which signifies danger which is what a thriller is supposed to be. I also think they have mood use of the misc-en-scene as the villain is wearing dark clothes which shows that he is mysterious and the audience don't know anything about him. I also think the sound is used well as the background music in the opening parts of the scene gives off a calm mood but at the same time, still seems like something bad might happen. Also, the scream at the end of the film is a good use as it shows the fear of the girl in the film and gives the audience the impression that she is in trouble. Also, the film ends on a cliffhanger with this scene as the audience want to know what happens to the girl at the end of the film. There was no technical mistakes, but I feel that more use of a MacGuffin and more different shots would make this film better.
Rating 3
Does it look like the opening of a film?
Can you see any "thriller" conventions?
Have they made good use of mise-en-scene?
Is there a combination of diegetic and non-diegetic sound?
Have they made any technical mistakes (e.g. poor lighting, shaky camera)?
Is the quality of the performance at a high level?
After answering these questions, I shall be grading the film based on these numbers:
4- Excellent
3- Proficient
2- Minimal
1- Basic
Treachery
I think that this could be seen as the opening to a thriller but it could be also seen as a possible trailer.
One of the conventions of a thriller is a cliffhanger and that is seen in this thriller as the film ends with a cliffhanger of what's going to happen and who is actually going to die as two people are seen to be tied up. I think they have made good use of the mise-en-scene as there is alot of darkness in this thriller and darkness is a key point of a thriller because of the negative mood that it suggests. I think that they have made good use of the diegetic and non diegetic sound. For example, the diegetic sound is used well and you can hear it the boys voice that he doesn't want to kill anymore. An example of non-diegetic sound which is used well is the background music as it creates the mood of danger and that something bad is going to happen. When I watched this, I was able to spot a few technical mistakes that they made. One mistake that they made is at 0:33, when the girl is giving the picture to the boy. When she speaks, it is hard to hear what she is actually saying as the audio levels are really low. Another technical mistake that is made in this film is at 0:43 when there is a shot of the boy looking at the picture and thinking. We see a slight camera movement to the left which is a technical mistake. All things considered, I think this film is a good film but it could be improved.
Rating: High 2/Low 3
Finders Keepers
I think that this opening to a thriller has been mad very well as it contains many elements of a thriller. For example, it has the MacGuffin in where the first man in the suit goes into his pocket to pull out what the audience might think is a gun but he actually pulls out a mobile phone. A cliffhanger is also used well at the end of the thriller as the audience will want to know what is going to happen next with the 3 men who end the scene. I also think they have made good use of the misc-en-scene as the men in the suits look very convincing and very business like. They also used the chase scene very well. There is good use of non diegetic sound with the music in the background which creates the suspense within the film. However, I feel that there should be more diegetic sounds in terms of speech etc. I wasn't able to find any technical mistakes. All things considered, I think that this is a very good opening.
Rating 4
Hidden
I think that this is a decent opening to a thriller. They have used a lot of darkness which signifies danger which is what a thriller is supposed to be. I also think they have mood use of the misc-en-scene as the villain is wearing dark clothes which shows that he is mysterious and the audience don't know anything about him. I also think the sound is used well as the background music in the opening parts of the scene gives off a calm mood but at the same time, still seems like something bad might happen. Also, the scream at the end of the film is a good use as it shows the fear of the girl in the film and gives the audience the impression that she is in trouble. Also, the film ends on a cliffhanger with this scene as the audience want to know what happens to the girl at the end of the film. There was no technical mistakes, but I feel that more use of a MacGuffin and more different shots would make this film better.
Rating 3
Friday, 6 December 2013
Preliminary Task - The Unsuspected
Plot
Our story is about John (Carl), who gets called into the room to have a chat with the head teacher (Freddie). John then gets paranoid because he thinks that the head teacher knows about his involvement with a year 7 who has died. The head teacher doesn't even know about this so he asks John about what happened. John starts to panic lots and tells the story of how the Year 7 kid tripped and how there was blood everywhere. John denies that he killed him and tells the head teacher that he wasn't sure what to do at the time of events. He says that he tried to help the little kid but was so in shock by the whole situation and that he didn't know what to do. John is heard stuttering his words and being a bit shaky with his hands. The head teacher then reveals that the only reason why he wanted to see John was because he had been bunking his classes but then takes an interest into the Year 7 situation. John then realises this and attempt to escape the classroom but the head teacher grabs his arm and attempts to find out more about the situation. John then quickly runs out of the classroom, almost tripping over, and then runs away from the classroom as the head teacher follows him. As John is running away, someone is walking along the corridor. John then bumps into him/her and quickly runs off again. The head teacher walks out and warns him/her to not say anything about what they have seen and then follows John again. The film ends with the mystery person walking off down the corridor as the camera fades to the credits.
In our film, we used a match on action right at the beginning of the film. The match on action happens when John is seen opening the door and entering the room where the camera is placed on the outside of the classroom. The camera is then placed inside the classroom and shows John entering the room in the same way as the previous scene. In both scenes, the first scene led on to the second scene.
We also used the shot reverse shot in our film. This happened in the dialogue scenes between John and the head teacher in where the camera would change sides depending on who was talking. For example, if the head teacher was talking, then there would be an over the shoulder shot showing John's head and shoulders and then we would see the head teacher talking. We feel that this made the film more interesting to watch instead of just using one camera angle for the whole conversation.
Also, in our film, we didn't break the 180 degree rule. We filmed the whole film from one side of the room which means that the head teacher always was on the left side of the screen and John was on the right side of the screen.
Unfortunately, we wasn't able to include an eye line match but we did try and do it but we felt that it wouldn't work very well. We tried filming a scene in where the camera was where the head teacher was sitting and then John was looking directly into the camera and talking to the camera (head teacher). After watching it back, we feel that it felt more like an interview then a film so we decided to cut that out.
Overall, we feel that we did this preliminary exercise pretty well as we included most of the techniques that we have learnt about. If we was to do this again, we would try and include an eye line match that would fit in with our story.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

